 |
|
|
|
Davis Cup: Fish d. Wawrinka
|
02/10/2012 - 12:28 PM
|
 |
17
Comments
|
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
|
|
Posted by John T Lang |
02/10/2012 at 12:38 PM |
Can this be viewed online? |
|
Posted by John T Lang |
02/10/2012 at 12:40 PM |
Oh yeah, 1st! ha |
|
Posted by Andre Wright |
02/10/2012 at 01:05 PM |
Why it took him five sets. |
|
Posted by BetterAtSingles |
02/10/2012 at 01:10 PM |
Good piece, Steve. I like this one. You made the description of the match about as exciting as it can be written compared to watching it. |
|
Posted by another girl |
02/10/2012 at 01:17 PM |
beauty and truth here:
What Davis Cup is all about, in this case as in so many others, is not necessarily brilliant or unfaltering individual performances. It’s about the messier and more human drama of courage and failure crossing from one side of the net to the other every few games.
you are in very fine form... |
|
Posted by noleisthebest |
02/10/2012 at 01:28 PM |
Really happy for Fishie. |
|
Posted by noleisthebest |
02/10/2012 at 01:31 PM |
"It wasn’t pretty, but both players came off the mat and turned it into one more 15-round Davis Cup epic"
Why wasn't it pretty?
I thought they both played their hearts out and there were some really excellent rallies and shot-making.
Plus, tennis itself looked a bit more human after AO.
I'm glad Fed is having to "carry" Stan again :) |
|
Posted by Michele |
02/10/2012 at 01:55 PM |
I'm continually blown away by the five set DC matches. Sorry for Swiss Stan but yay for Spain's JC!
And here I thought the AO final was brutal. This looks so much harder from a pressure perspective. Gulp.
I'm also fascinated by the on-court couch/player relationship unique to DC -- and how hard it must be for, say, Courier to know how to walk that delicate line in the heat of the moment. |
|
Posted by k4 |
02/10/2012 at 02:35 PM |
Congrats to Fish. He deserved to win much earlier, but obviously struggled a lot with himself, more than with Wawrinka on court. He started quite well, then he lost his momentum, endless stroke of UE and than, when it was more than he was out in fourth set and the match obviously, he found himself hitting with precision in a way he started the match.
I'm watching the other match where Isner is leading by 2:1 in sets and is looking that Federer is having a lot of trouble with Isner returns when he need to be focus and contemplate the good play all around. But Isner is fighter, isn't he? Just a trivia. I cannot see how tennis could be more popular than football or baseball when even the commentators on FOX tv is cheering for Federer. It's like not enough that you don't have to watch the match at all to easy conclude what might be the result: each point won by Federer is celebrated with huge ovations, than after Isner won the same, it sounds like the match is muted suddenly, no one is cheering. It's expectable by Swiss crowd to celebrate his own, but for Americans to cheer the Swiss when US team is playing, common? |
|
Posted by k4 |
02/10/2012 at 02:53 PM |
So Isner did it. Huge congrats to him and US team! |
|
Posted by pera kojot |
02/10/2012 at 03:12 PM |
Congrats to Isner |
|
Posted by Fed Fan |
02/10/2012 at 03:25 PM |
Funny reading the comments from earlier about how this loss means Fed will have to "carry" Stan...ha ha, maybe it's the other way round. At least Stan put up a fight today. |
|
Posted by Ryan |
02/10/2012 at 03:33 PM |
I knew that it was toss up between USA and Suisse since Stan is inconsistent and Fed needed to be sharp against Isner and Fed is hardly sharp these days. The dubs will be toss up as well.
USA! USA! |
|
Posted by AP |
02/10/2012 at 03:36 PM |
Stan atleast tried to put up a fight today but I was really disappointed with the way Federer played in terms of mental toughness...Something is missing in him these days...the will to fight it out till the end is gone...
Look at Nole/Nadal who give it their all even if its the last point of the match..Federer on the other hand gives up so easily...No wonder they have won their matches against Isner who is the most unpredictable player on clay court and Federer lost it!
Federer- Low on Mental Toughness? http://bit.ly/w1rvpN |
|
Posted by noleisthebest |
02/10/2012 at 04:17 PM |
Fed Fan,
my comment was meant to be ironic. |
|
Posted by skip1515 |
02/10/2012 at 06:04 PM |
For what it's worth, the Fish/Wawrinka match wasn't particularly pretty, as Steve says, but it was exciting. I was at the match, and there were plenty of times (late in the 5th, especially) when neither player felt confident enough to go after the win, preferring to wait and not lose. I say that with no prejudice, it's quite understandable, and frankly more common than not.
To a great degree it was a battle of who managed their shaky shanky forehands better. Aside from their fist serve percentages (which I haven't researched), neither of them served a lot of big, flat first serves. While the court is surprisingly quick for clay (with a number of bad bounces, as you noted, Steve), it's still evident that a big first serve isn't an absolute advantage.
Unless you're John Isner, in which case the first serve is a humongous advantage, but only if you have the mental strength to put it and a bunch of other balls in play in order to win a match, which he did. In spades. |
|
|
|
Posted by: