Home       About Steve Tignor       Contact        RSS        Follow on Twitter Categories       Archive
Grounds Pass 1/27 01/26/2012 - 10:19 PM

AmMELBOURNE—After the fireworks, there is . . . the sleep. Last night was as late as I’ve filed an article, 3:00 A.M. or so Aussie time. Part of it was waiting for Roger Federer and then Rafael Nadal to come to the interview room, but part of it was also just time spent coming down from a great match with a hair-raising ending, and an event-filled day of tennis. Noise complaints aside, this has been a good women’s tournament. The new top tier did what they were supposed to do, and we got a pair of chaotically entertaining semifinals yesterday. Still, that story has been drowned out, literally, by the squawk talk. The Herald-Sun's article on the upcoming women's final comes with this headline: "Azarenka-Sharapova is the squeal deal." As I said the other day, the best reason to do something about shrieking is to stop the stories about why nothing is being done about shrieking.

The first men’s semi wasn’t bad, either. Nadal talked in his presser about how unlucky Federer has been at the Grand Slams lately, and Federer must feel snake-bit again after this one. He had a break point at 4-5 in the fourth and played it perfectly, until Nadal ran out of his shoes and dropped a lob smack on the baseline. Before that shot, as Rafa was starting to tighten up on serve, I had begun to think: What if it’s Nadal’s turn to lose after having match points? A few minutes later, it was over.

The upshot is that I opened the hotel curtains this morning to be greeted by the Melbourne sun at noon. I had no idea what time it was—amazing what hotel curtains can do. Which means I better get to my Grounds Pass.

Links: The Australian; The Age; Herald-Sun

*****

Not So Fast
We’ll go off-court, and nearly off-road, to start. It seems that Bernie Tomic’s vaunted new maturity has hit a speed bump. The 19-year-old was pulled over yesterday for the second time in recent months for driving a tad rapidly in his bright orange BMW. This time, Tomic kept driving, straight to his house, where he reportedly locked himself inside while the police waited on the front lawn in what was termed a "stand-off." Tomic claimed the cops have it in for him: “The police officer wanted to hit me,” Bernie claimed. “I don’t know what I am doing. It’s like I killed someone.”

All of which didn’t make Aussie Davis Cup captain Pat Rafter look too good. Even as Tomic was burning up the road near his Gold Coast home, Rafter was talking to interviewers about how much his new star had matured in recent months.

“I was very critical of him last year,” said Rafter, who wasn’t happy when Bernie, against team rules, brought his girlfriend along to team functions during the September tie against Switzerland. “He wasn’t in the right head space. The improvement he’s made, he’s gone in the right direction and he impressed me over the summer.”

Tomic: Still confounding. Fair or not, entitlement has always been part of his persona, and it still is.

*****

Puncher’s Chance
Andy Murray is back with another column for The Australian today, a day of reckoning for him. Despite the constant references to boxing and sushi, his articles have been fairly revealing. It's obvious that Ivan Lendl has had a significant effect on him already.

Murray talks about how he hung out with Novak Djokovic last year in Oz and organized football friendlies with him. Not this time. Lendl has taught him to distance himself from his rivals, and that something like football on the side is a waste of energy.

“You have to make sure you put all that to one side,” Murray writes. “I’ll be doing whatever it takes to win tonight. If that means hitting Novak to win a point . . . that is what I’ll do.”

Interesting that Murray wouldn’t just make this shift in his mind, but that he would announce it in print as well.

Then he goes to say what he’ll do if he beats Djokovic tonight: “You can bet on one thing," Murray informs us, "I’ll be tucking into some spicy tuna again tomorrow night.”

*****

Ivan the Engine Driver
In other Murray-Lendl news, according to the Age, Rafter believes that just having Lendl in his camp has had an effect on the rest of the tour.

“It makes a psychological difference to the opponents,” Rafter said. “You know, they all talk about Lendl being in the box. So that obviously helps.”

Another Aussie legend, Fiery Fred Stolle, is even more impressed by what Lendl has pulled off. “He’s made a difference in two or three days,” Stolle says. “Lendl’s got him doing things that he didn’t do, and one of them is he doesn’t look up to the box when Lendl’s there. He gets the job done . . . [Murray’s] done it all his life [look up]. But he hasn’t had a coach that’s told him not to. Now he has one.”

*****

Roger on the Run . . . Again
As of yesterday afternoon, the tennis world was once more Roger Federer’s for the taking. Most pundits thought his form was too good to be derailed, even by the great derailer, Nadal. Today, Federer wakes up to this headline in the Herald-Sun:

COULD ROGER BE PAST THE FIREWORKS?

“As outrageous as it might sound,” Scott Gullan writes, “it’s increasingly unlikely Roger Federer will win another Grand Slam title.”

I saw it differently yesterday. It may turn out that Federer won’t win another major, but I’m still surprised and impressed by his desire and ability to remain as committed as ever, even after everything he's won. His career, Slam wins or not, now looks like it will stretch longer than I would have guessed two years ago.

Credit Federer also for not rationalizing his losses by acting as if he’s in the twilight of his tennis life. He expects as much from himself as he did five years ago; anything else would be a rip-off to fans of the sport.

*****

Muzz Buzz
Now, finally, we’ll see how far Andy Murray has progressed. Muzz’s ex-coach, Brad Gilbert, likes what he sees from the new partnership so far in the Daily Mail:

WHY MEATBALLS AND MELTDOWNS ARE OFF THE MENU

BG says he sees a technical change in Murray’s forehand: “There appears to be a greater shoulder turn to get more side on. It gives him greater power on the forehand to smack anything short away.”

I haven’t noticed this personally, but it’s one more thing to look for tonight.

So does Gilbert believe Murray has a shot? After a thousand or so words on why he’s improving, BG renders his verdict:

No. He’s going with the Djoker.


18
Comments



Posted by Master Ace 01/26/2012 at 10:28 PM

Will Lendl's influence be good enough to beat Djokovic and Nadal to gain his maiden Slam?

Posted by AP 01/26/2012 at 10:54 PM

Djokovic's strong point has been his returns points won ( 55% - "Djokovic - Murray Semifinal- What do Australian Open Stats Indicate?" http://bit.ly/yM80VE ) and if Murray continues to serve the way he did in QF, I think it will be tough for him to win this match.

And we all know when it comes to crucial moments, Murray is not mentally tough like Djokovic. he is prone to emotional outbursts during important matches esp when things do not go his way. I think this is the first time, Murray will be put under lot of pressure in this tournament and this is when I will want to see if Murray has really become someone else or it was just another act till now!

Posted by Laj 01/26/2012 at 11:22 PM

Roger is really under appreciated at 30 years - to think that anyone would be a consistent Grand Slam contender at that age is amazing. But I can understand how people feel about the Fedal rivalry and how it affects Fed's legacy. I think it boils down to Fed being raised during a primarily offensive era and Nadal's defensive clay court play being better tuned to strategic thinking. IT seems that the game only has one direction now - get more physical. Doesn't bode well for Tomic's chances at #1...

Posted by Stephen 01/26/2012 at 11:25 PM

I really liked your article today. Thank you.

Posted by Lucky Strike 01/26/2012 at 11:43 PM

Just two words for you Laj: Rod Laver. Check yr history...

Posted by Robert 01/26/2012 at 11:45 PM

Right Laj, at 30 Roger is still a treat in any GS. The H2H against Nadal is his only blemish in a otherwise fantastic resume. But this H2H looks that bad because Roger has given Nadal the chance to play him thirteen times after passing his prime (2008 and beyond). with Nadal winning ten of these matches and Roger taking the other 3. During Roger's prime (2004 - 2007) when he was invincible aside clay, his H2H against Nadal was a sporty 6-8, after that the gap badly widened.

Posted by Mr. Truth( I'm back!) 01/26/2012 at 11:56 PM

It's kinda funny how big a deal everyone is making the Ivan Lendl thing. Lendle has been with Murray for all of...what, a month? Tops? There is NO WAY there has been sufficient time to work on hardcore technical changes.

And I like Andy, But the dude is not a good matchup with the Djoker. Djokovic is a better shot maker, and an equally good counter puncher. May as well stay up for this one cuz it ain't going too long.

Djokovic in 3. And that's THE TRUTH

Posted by Slick 01/27/2012 at 12:00 AM

The fact that an injured Nadal can take care of Federer so easily is a testament to Rafa's claim to the GOAT title. Federer = Frauderer, no heart when the going gets tough. We've seen it time after time. Sampras puked on the court and still pulled through, we have never, nor will we ever see that kind of competitive spark from the weak era champion...

Posted by Mr. Truth( I'm back!) 01/27/2012 at 12:04 AM

@slick

oh jeez......you just had to go there.....here we go.....ready?
MORTAAAAAAAAAAAL KOMBAAAAAAAAAAAAAT!

Posted by really 01/27/2012 at 12:21 AM

nadal was injuried? i watched the whole tourney he didn't look injured, but that's just me. maybe i missed something. NOT!

Posted by Aabye 01/27/2012 at 12:30 AM

I loved the point in the Courier interview when Jim asked Rafa to give some advice to Murray, and he admitted he probably wasn't the best person to ask.

Posted by jr 01/27/2012 at 01:19 AM

vamos RAFA! make them a believer!

Posted by tennis ace 01/27/2012 at 01:33 AM

Nadal will win the Australian Open. No doubt.

Posted by james 01/27/2012 at 02:20 AM

no doubt? huge rafa fan, but i do not think it will come with ease. nevertheless, VAMOS RAFA!!

Posted by Ajithkumar 01/27/2012 at 02:29 AM

@Laj

Too much is being said about the age of Federer. He was 28 when Nadal completely dominated him, and 28 is not an age which you will associate with elders be it any sport. Think of Rod laver.

Federer is a great player and plays the game with such beatuy that there are very few who can match his elegance over the entire tennis history, but the game has evolved where tact, strength, planning and stamina are important to win consistently. Federer dominated an era when there was a dearth for real talent with Sampras gone and only Marat Safin left as a class player.. However with the arrival a new talent (strenth, stamina and tact superior to federer) he is finding it hard to win slams. However his natural skill and talent is helping him to win matches and reach semis and finals consistently.

Posted by Kim 01/27/2012 at 02:30 AM

Djokovic is going to win it all. I don't see how Nadal is going to beat him...4 sets for nole.

I like this http://www.fit-2-hit.com

Posted by silent KAD of nobody 01/27/2012 at 03:00 AM

Wait, what??? I am a Fed fan (who does NOT hate Rafa though) as well, but why emergence of Djokovic made some Fed fans happy? Just because he can beat Rafa consistently on 2012?? First, you do realize this isn't the first time Nadal constantly losing to a player within a year or two right? (Heck, no need of mentioning Del Po in 2009, Blake made Rafa ran in despair for more than a year [and we all know what happened after Rafa is a bit matured]) As a fan, don't count on other player (s) to beat our model, that's just...beyond sad, and if this match is already a good indicator, Rafa of 2011 suffers mental block, somehow even worse than Fed; but would that still work for Novak's favor in 2012? I dunno (again, do not assume Rafa WILL LOSE in the final). Second, the surge of Djokovic, fairly speaking, pose worse threat to Roger than Rafa, Nadal still has luxury to work his game, but what about senile Federer??

After Godkovic's amazing run in 2011, he has NOTHING left to prove for NOW, and yet, for the same moment, Roger and Rafa (especially him) has EVERYTHING to prove. Amazing how one person can deeply affect 2 tennis greats.

Posted by Jack 01/27/2012 at 10:41 AM

Asesoría en cuentas Off Shore. Transferencias a cualquier parte del mundo. Comisiones sobre ganancias que realicemos. Cuenta en línea con el mercado 24/7. Manejo de capitales con total privacidad. Estrategias de diversificación y cobertura de riesgo. Reportes del Mercado al momento en su Celular. Estudiamos las mejores Inversiones según sus requerimientos.
aicapitales.com

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Leave a Comment



<<  Brain Game Fireworks  >>




Fan Club: Andy Roddick
Believers
Rinse and Repeat
Eyes Have It
Playing Ball: That Winning Shot
Still the Same, Still the Name
Fan Club: Rafa II
This blog has 1296 entries and 87630 comments.
More
More Video
Daily Spin