 |
|
|
|
Grounds Pass 1/27
|
01/26/2012 - 10:19 PM
|
 |
|
Posted by Master Ace |
01/26/2012 at 10:28 PM |
Will Lendl's influence be good enough to beat Djokovic and Nadal to gain his maiden Slam? |
|
Posted by AP |
01/26/2012 at 10:54 PM |
Djokovic's strong point has been his returns points won ( 55% - "Djokovic - Murray Semifinal- What do Australian Open Stats Indicate?" http://bit.ly/yM80VE ) and if Murray continues to serve the way he did in QF, I think it will be tough for him to win this match.
And we all know when it comes to crucial moments, Murray is not mentally tough like Djokovic. he is prone to emotional outbursts during important matches esp when things do not go his way. I think this is the first time, Murray will be put under lot of pressure in this tournament and this is when I will want to see if Murray has really become someone else or it was just another act till now! |
|
Posted by Laj |
01/26/2012 at 11:22 PM |
Roger is really under appreciated at 30 years - to think that anyone would be a consistent Grand Slam contender at that age is amazing. But I can understand how people feel about the Fedal rivalry and how it affects Fed's legacy. I think it boils down to Fed being raised during a primarily offensive era and Nadal's defensive clay court play being better tuned to strategic thinking. IT seems that the game only has one direction now - get more physical. Doesn't bode well for Tomic's chances at #1... |
|
Posted by Stephen |
01/26/2012 at 11:25 PM |
I really liked your article today. Thank you. |
|
Posted by Lucky Strike |
01/26/2012 at 11:43 PM |
Just two words for you Laj: Rod Laver. Check yr history... |
|
Posted by Robert |
01/26/2012 at 11:45 PM |
Right Laj, at 30 Roger is still a treat in any GS. The H2H against Nadal is his only blemish in a otherwise fantastic resume. But this H2H looks that bad because Roger has given Nadal the chance to play him thirteen times after passing his prime (2008 and beyond). with Nadal winning ten of these matches and Roger taking the other 3. During Roger's prime (2004 - 2007) when he was invincible aside clay, his H2H against Nadal was a sporty 6-8, after that the gap badly widened. |
|
Posted by Mr. Truth( I'm back!) |
01/26/2012 at 11:56 PM |
It's kinda funny how big a deal everyone is making the Ivan Lendl thing. Lendle has been with Murray for all of...what, a month? Tops? There is NO WAY there has been sufficient time to work on hardcore technical changes.
And I like Andy, But the dude is not a good matchup with the Djoker. Djokovic is a better shot maker, and an equally good counter puncher. May as well stay up for this one cuz it ain't going too long.
Djokovic in 3. And that's THE TRUTH |
|
Posted by Slick |
01/27/2012 at 12:00 AM |
The fact that an injured Nadal can take care of Federer so easily is a testament to Rafa's claim to the GOAT title. Federer = Frauderer, no heart when the going gets tough. We've seen it time after time. Sampras puked on the court and still pulled through, we have never, nor will we ever see that kind of competitive spark from the weak era champion... |
|
Posted by Mr. Truth( I'm back!) |
01/27/2012 at 12:04 AM |
@slick
oh jeez......you just had to go there.....here we go.....ready?
MORTAAAAAAAAAAAL KOMBAAAAAAAAAAAAAT! |
|
Posted by really |
01/27/2012 at 12:21 AM |
nadal was injuried? i watched the whole tourney he didn't look injured, but that's just me. maybe i missed something. NOT! |
|
Posted by Aabye |
01/27/2012 at 12:30 AM |
I loved the point in the Courier interview when Jim asked Rafa to give some advice to Murray, and he admitted he probably wasn't the best person to ask. |
|
Posted by jr |
01/27/2012 at 01:19 AM |
vamos RAFA! make them a believer! |
|
Posted by tennis ace |
01/27/2012 at 01:33 AM |
Nadal will win the Australian Open. No doubt. |
|
Posted by james |
01/27/2012 at 02:20 AM |
no doubt? huge rafa fan, but i do not think it will come with ease. nevertheless, VAMOS RAFA!! |
|
Posted by Ajithkumar |
01/27/2012 at 02:29 AM |
@Laj
Too much is being said about the age of Federer. He was 28 when Nadal completely dominated him, and 28 is not an age which you will associate with elders be it any sport. Think of Rod laver.
Federer is a great player and plays the game with such beatuy that there are very few who can match his elegance over the entire tennis history, but the game has evolved where tact, strength, planning and stamina are important to win consistently. Federer dominated an era when there was a dearth for real talent with Sampras gone and only Marat Safin left as a class player.. However with the arrival a new talent (strenth, stamina and tact superior to federer) he is finding it hard to win slams. However his natural skill and talent is helping him to win matches and reach semis and finals consistently. |
|
Posted by Kim |
01/27/2012 at 02:30 AM |
Djokovic is going to win it all. I don't see how Nadal is going to beat him...4 sets for nole.
I like this http://www.fit-2-hit.com |
|
Posted by silent KAD of nobody |
01/27/2012 at 03:00 AM |
Wait, what??? I am a Fed fan (who does NOT hate Rafa though) as well, but why emergence of Djokovic made some Fed fans happy? Just because he can beat Rafa consistently on 2012?? First, you do realize this isn't the first time Nadal constantly losing to a player within a year or two right? (Heck, no need of mentioning Del Po in 2009, Blake made Rafa ran in despair for more than a year [and we all know what happened after Rafa is a bit matured]) As a fan, don't count on other player (s) to beat our model, that's just...beyond sad, and if this match is already a good indicator, Rafa of 2011 suffers mental block, somehow even worse than Fed; but would that still work for Novak's favor in 2012? I dunno (again, do not assume Rafa WILL LOSE in the final). Second, the surge of Djokovic, fairly speaking, pose worse threat to Roger than Rafa, Nadal still has luxury to work his game, but what about senile Federer??
After Godkovic's amazing run in 2011, he has NOTHING left to prove for NOW, and yet, for the same moment, Roger and Rafa (especially him) has EVERYTHING to prove. Amazing how one person can deeply affect 2 tennis greats. |
|
Posted by Jack |
01/27/2012 at 10:41 AM |
Asesoría en cuentas Off Shore. Transferencias a cualquier parte del mundo. Comisiones sobre ganancias que realicemos. Cuenta en línea con el mercado 24/7. Manejo de capitales con total privacidad. Estrategias de diversificación y cobertura de riesgo. Reportes del Mercado al momento en su Celular. Estudiamos las mejores Inversiones según sus requerimientos.
aicapitales.com |
|
|
|
Posted by: